Got an email yesterday with the following question regarding our Open Source Learning Future Salon:
Mark, thanks for putting on a great lecture series. I got a lot out of Jamais Cascio's seminar. The description of Gatto's presentation sounds like a diatribe against our current education system, which we all agree could be improved. Does he has any positive suggestions? The talk as described sounds like a bummer.
I asked John about any positive suggestions to our education problem and here is his responds: An article he wrote a couple of years ago. Once you read it, you may understand why I am so looking forward to our Open Source Learning Future Salon on the 21st of August. RSVP: http://snurl.
Compulsion-schooling tries to shoehorn every style,
culture, and personality into one ugly boot that fits nobody.
Admit there is no one right to grow up successfully.
One-system schooling has-had a century
and a half to prove itself. It is a ghastly failure, Children need the widest
possible range of roads in order to find the right one to accommodate
themselves. The premise upon which mass compulsion schooling is based is dead
wrong. It tries to shoehorn every style, culture, and personality into one ugly
boot that fits nobody. 1fax credits, vouchers, and other more
sophisticated means the necessary to encourage a diverse mix of different
school logics of growing up. Only sharp competition can reform the present
mess; this needs to be an overriding goal of public policy. Neither national
nor state government oversight is necessary to make a voucher/tax credit plan
work:
a modicum of local control, a disclosure law with teeth, and a policy of client
satisfaction or else is all the citizen protection heeded. It works for
supermarkets and doctors. It will work for schools, too, without national
testing.
Teach children to think dialectically so they can
challenge the hidden assumptions of
the world about them, including school assumptions, so they can eventually
generate much of their own personal curriculum and oversight. But teach them,
too, that dialectical thinking is unsuited to many important things lil&
love and family. Dialectical analysis is radically inappropriate outside its
purview.
Arrange much of schooling around complex themes
instead of subjects. “Subjects” have a
real
value, too, but subject study as an
exclusive diet was a Prussian secret weapon to produce social layering.
Substantial amount of interdisciplinary work are needed as a corrective.,
Force the school structure to provide flex-time, flex-space. flex-sequencing,
and flex-content so that every student can
be personalized to
fit the whole range of individual styles and performance.
Break the teacher certification monopoly so anyone
with something valuable to teach can teach it. Nothing is more important
than this.
Our form of
schooling has turned us into dependent, emotionally needy, excessively childish
people who wait for a teacher to tell them what to do. Our national dilemma is
that too many of us are now homeless and mindless in the deepest sense—at the
mercy of strangers.
The beginning of
answers will come only when people force government to return educational
choice to everyone. But choice is meaningless without an absolute right to have
progress monitored locally too, not by an agency of the central government.
Solzhenitsyn was right. The American founding documents didn’t mention school
because the authors foresaw the path school would inevitably set us upon, and
rejected it.
The best way to
start offering some choice immediately is
to give each public school the independence that private schools have.
De-systematize them, grant each private, parochial, and home school equal
access to public funds through vouchers administered as a loan program, along
with tax credits. In time the need for even this would diminish, but my warning
stands—if these keys to choice are tied to intrusive government oversight, as
some would argue they must be, they will only hasten the end of the American
libertarian experiment.
Vouchers are only
a transition to what is really called for: an economy of independent
livelihoods, a resurrection of principles over pragmatism, and restoration of
the private obligation, self-imposed, to provide a living wage to all who work
for you. School can never deal with really
important things. Only education can teach us that quests don’t always work,
that even worthy lives most often end in tragedy, that money can’t prevent
this; that failure is a regular part of the human condition; that you will
never understand evil; that serious pursuits are almost always lonely; that you
can’t negotiate love; that money can’t buy much that really matters; that
happiness is free.
A 25-year-old school dropout walked the length of the planet without help, a 17-year-old school dropout worked a 26-foot sailboat all by herself around the girdle of the globe. What else does it take to realize the horrifying limitations we have inflicted on our children? School is a liar’s world. Let us be done with it.
Recent Comments